May 6: The Advertiser: DPP insults victims of crime, says MP
Posted by admin on 05/6/06 in Political Opinion, Kapunda Road Royal Commission
DPP insults victims of crime, says MP By Craig Bildstien 06may06
THE self-confessed “villain” of Parliament, Nick Xenophon, yesterday demanded the State Government appoint an independent regulator to oversee the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions.
In an address to the SA Press Club, Mr Xenophon described the behaviour of chief prosecutor Stephen Pallaras, QC, towards victims of crime and their families as “an insult”. He called on Attorney-General Michael Atkinson to instigate “decent, robust, independent” scrutiny of the DPP’s decision-making.
Mr Xenophon said Mr Pallaras needed “to be kept on his toes” and should be forced to answer questions about the way he prosecuted some cases. He suggested former Kapunda Road Royal Commissioner Greg James, QC, would be ideal to conduct an independent inquiry.
Mr Atkinson, who attended the forum, said later an organisational review of the DPP’s office was underway. He said the DPP’s office had emerged “unscathed” from Mr James’ inquiry into the hit-run death of cyclist Ian Humphrey. Asked about the status of Solicitor-General Chris Kourakis’s recommendation he appoint an independent counsel to provide advice independent to the DPP, Mr Atkinson said: “I’m thinking about it.”
Mr Humphrey’s widow Di Gilchrist, who attended yesterday’s lunch, supported Mr Xenophon’s call. “There needs to be some radical changes in the way cases are prosecuted,” she said. “Victims are not represented. They are treated as secondary items in the process.” Mr Pallaras refused to comment.
Sphere: Related Content
WoJ RSS Feed







Anonymous | May 11, 2006 | Reply
As a regular cyclist and motorcylist who also works in the legal community - yes, the mcgee initial prosecution sucked big time. However I wanted to make a few points in relation Xenophon for those not in South Australia.
Again the antics of Xeno in the SA house of reps would indeed make any good publicist blush.
His offhand lash out at Pallaras is to be expected and should only be seen as a post-election attempt to be kept in the media scrum. He is a heavy duty publicist and a lightweight pollie who like Rann lives by 15 minute media opportunities. Pollaras on the other hand is a serious and respected legal attack dog in his own right- to be feared by any any parliamentary committee cause he says his mind and does not pull his punches. Xeno’s allusion that the DPP has failed the judicial process is both ludicrous and shallow, that again has the hallmarks of the Xenophon media-stunt written on it.
The DPP has teeth that bite, as many including Rann have discovered - and maybe Xeno will also experience in good time. The real story you should be sourcing/posting is what the Solicitor General - another individual genuinely committed to judicial system reform - actually meant by his stated recommendations about appointing counsel to provide independent advice.
Im now intrigued so i will find out and let you know also.
N